I take A LOT of pictures, in fact I rarely leave the house without a camera, usually my favourite compact but sometimes I make do with my phone.
Many photographers believe in limiting yourself, like a roll of film, you give yourself a set number of shots (or you use just one fixed lens) and this causes you to think more and be pickier with your shots. I don’t really do that. I’m the kind of person who sees something they like, takes a picture of it, maybe even a dozen different ones and then decides if they like how it looks. I think of it as having no regrets in my photography. If the shot doesn’t work, it doesn’t work but at least I won’t have to deal with wondering whether or not it would have.
As a photographer I like to keep my pictures relatively clean. I usually focus on singular subjects and strong colour harmony. In general I try to keep a discernible subject or event in each image and try to keep things as technically sound as possible in terms of image quality. While I’m not too worried about things like sharpness as I once was when I first started, I still try to maintain a good level of clarity in my published work.
However, there are times when I end up with images that don’t really have much meaning to them, aren’t particularly interesting or have some sort of technical error in them that I very much enjoy but don’t really publish due to these flaws.
But then again, what really makes an image perfect, it is all creative expression at the end of the day, it doesn’t really need to adhere to any rules. That being said, I’m going to talk about some of these images, what makes them imperfect under my own style and why I love them regardless.
P.S This is Shahed Sami and I love him